Skip to main content

Marcel Duchamp, Readymade


"Asked to submit something for display in 1917, Duchamp sent a urinal. ...Duchamp reflected on the history of art and decided to make a statement. The artist is not a great creator - Duchamp went shopping at a plumbing store. The artwork is not a special object - it was mass-produced in a factory. The experience of art is not exciting and ennobling - at best it is puzzling and mostly leaves one with a sense of distaste. But over and above that, Duchamp did not select just any ready-made object to display. In selecting the urinal, his message was clear: Art is something you piss on".
Here is what Duchamp wrote about this:

The Richard Mutt Case: Anonymous article in The Blind Man # 2, May 1917.
Written by Beatrice Wood, H.P. RochĂ© and/or Marcel Duchamp.

They say any artist paying six dollars may exhibit.
Mr. Richard Mutt sent in a fountain. Without discussion this article disappeared and was never exhibited.
What were the grounds for refusing Mr. Mutt's fountain:
1. Some contend it was immoral, vulgar.
2. Others, it was plagiarism, a plain piece of plumbing.
Now Mr. Mutt's fountain is not immoral, that is absurd, no more than a bath tub is immoral. It is a fixture that you see every day in plumbers' show windows.
Whether Mr. Mutt with his own hands made the fountain or not has no importance. He CHOSE it. He took an ordinary article of life, placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under a new title and point of view – created a new thought for that object.
As for plumbing, that is absurd. The only works of art America has given are her plumbing and her bridges.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Francis Bacon on accidents

This is part of an interview with Francis Bacon by Davis Sylvester, from "Interviews With Francis Bacon" by Davis Sylvester FB I think I tend to destroy the better paintings, or those that have been better to a certain extent. I try and take them further, and they lose all their qualities, and they lose everything. I think I would say that I tend to destroy all the better paintings. DS Can you never get it back once it’s gone over the top? FB Not now, and less and less. As the way I work is totally, now, accidental, and becomes more and more accidental, and doesn’t seem to behave, as it were, unless it is accidental, how can I recreate an accident? It’s almost an impossible thing to do. DS But you might get another accident on the same canvas. FB One might get another accident, bit it would never be quite the same. This is the thing that can probably happen only in oil paint, because it is so subtle that one tone, one piece of paint, that moves one thing into ...

Flusser

Check out this website , that is all about Flusser. Click on "current issue" for articles about Flusser and art. Valentina - there is an article in 'current issue' - "The Gesture of Writing", by Flusser. Maybe it will help with your work. Flusser Studies Multilingual Journal for Cultural and Media Theory Flusser Studies is an international e-journal for academic research dedicated to the thought of VilĂ©m Flusser (1920-1991). In addition to publishing articles about Flusser’s work, the journal seeks to promote scholarship on different aspects of specifically interdisciplinary and multilingual approaches Flusser himself developed in the course of his career as a writer and philosopher. These approaches range from Communication Theory to Translation Studies, Cultural Anthropology to the New Media.

Places

Mona Hatoum Mobile Home II, 2006 Furniture, household objects, suitcases, galvanized steel barriers, three electric motors and pulley system Richard Sera Richard Sera Richard Sera Roxy Paine's Conjoined , 2007 installed at Madison Square Park, New York Roxy Raine Bruce Nauman MAPPING THE STUDIO II with color shift, flip, flop, & flip/flop (Fat Chance John Cage) Julia Scher, Security by Julia II , Artists Space, New York, 1989. Palais de Tokyo, Paris Janet Cardiff Muriel Lake Incident 1999 Janet Cardiff Forty-Part Motet 2001 (British Edition)